You decide how involved you want to be. If you have the time and desire, log into your account and get in touch with your writer. From there you can keep a finger on the pulse and make sure the order is fulfilled on time (even though ALL our orders are delivered in a timely fashion).
Don’t want to be involved at all? Then let the magic happen on its own and check your inbox when the deadline approaches.
The reason why there is a possibility for you to control your writer is because we want to deliver the best possible result, and it’s always better to have a customer’s input.
And if you don’t feel up to it, all the writers we work with are qualified to create perfectly fine papers on their own. To work at this service, we require at least a master’s degree and 2 years of experience – enough to produce brilliant papers on a regular basis.
The focus on individuals is so entrenched, however, that even those who think they’re taking social factors into account usually aren’t. This is as true of Murray’s critics as it is of Murray himself. Perhaps Murray’s greatest single mistake is to misinterpret the failure of federal antipoverty programs. He assumes that federal programs actually target the social causes of poverty, which means that if they don’t work, social causes must not be the issue. But he’s simply got it wrong. Welfare and other antipoverty programs are ‘social’ only in the sense that they’re organized around the idea that social systems like government have a responsibility to do something about poverty. But antipoverty programs are not organized around a sociological understanding of how systems produce poverty in the first place. As a result, they focus almost entirely on changing individuals and not systems, and use the resources of government and other systems to make it happen.